Pros
- Remote work - Nice and fun office - Catered lunches twice a week - Smart people - More processes in place by HR in recent times - Great brand name
Cons
A sentiment shared broadly is the absence of structural transparency in key people processes. Career progression frameworks remain loosely defined, and the benchmarks governing compensation adjustments or advancement are rarely, if ever, articulated with clarity. The basis for certain promotion decisions has not always inspired confidence across the team. Compounding this is the near-impossibility of meaningfully engaging in compensation discussions - by the time employees are made aware of review outcomes, decisions have already been finalised upstream, leaving little room for dialogue or negotiation. The window to advocate for oneself, it seems, perpetually closes before one ever knew it was open. At a strategic level, product direction in a couple of teams lacks the coherence one would expect of a maturing organisation - leadership in these areas continues to operate with the improvisational quality of an early-stage venture. Similarly, decisions around workforce scaling - whether expansion or contraction - tend to materialise without adequate forewarning or explanation, leaving employees to connect the dots retrospectively.