Toxic - Machine Operator PepsiCo Employee Review

1.0
Nov 30, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Money. The one and only pro.

Cons

A toxic work environment with awful management and completely disorganised. ‘Silent assain’ is always watching, it can only be compared to a hellhole. Salts foreman is a big problem in the area. Company culture, voicing opinions fearlessly and acting with integrity all mean nothing to PepsiCo. The bullying on the production floor by both operators and management is second to none. Physically and emotionally bullied in my time there. Was threatened by managers if I went to HR it would go against me getting a permanent job. Bully never faced any consequences. In fact they get permanent job. Acting with integrity means being honest and doing the right thing, there is nothing being done right in the plant and most certainly nothing being done honestly. If bullying is starting from the top down what else can you expect from operators?

Explore other reviews about PepsiCo

5.0
May 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Solid structure, goals are attainable, strong leadership.

Cons

Fortune 50 company comes with restructuring and potential employees headcount resizing.

4.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Worked for PepsiCo for 10 years across four locations in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Florida. Gained experience in multiple sales and operational roles while supporting account growth, merchandising, and customer relationships. Florida locations were especially well-operated and efficient. PepsiCo provided competitive pay, solid benefits through Keystone, and a good vacation package compared to competitors in the beverage industry. The company also offered strong sales incentive programs, earning rewards such as Orlando Magic floor seats, Pro Bowl tickets, Apple Watches, and Yeti cups for exceeding performance goals and driving sales results.

Cons

While PepsiCo promotes internal growth opportunities, many promotions and leadership opportunities appeared to favor college internship hires over long-term internal employees. In some cases, newer college-based management pushed corporate initiatives without fully understanding local market realities or account volume trends. For example, innovation products were sometimes forced into low-volume accounts where sell-through was unrealistic. Operationally, certain delivery processes could be improved, particularly with Tropicana products being stored in coolers on trucks for extended periods, which could impact product quality and increase waste. Work-life balance could also be challenging, as sales representatives commonly worked 50–60 hour weeks. Expectations from corporate leadership were often unrealistic, especially when customer representatives and drivers were expected to fully stock stores while servicing 15+ accounts per day. Experiences could also vary depending on whether locations were union or non-union operated.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All